How might opposing schools of economic thought – from neoclassical and Keynesian to Libertarian and Marxist, view Christmas presents? Levity aside, the answer reveals the pompousness and vacuity of each and every economic theory.

The Economists Who Stole Christmas – Project Syndu
30/12/2017 by Yanis Varoufakis
Related Posts
Banking Crisis Box0_TOP_ENG Digital Economies/Money English Op-ed Project Syndicate The Global Minotaur: A theory of the Global Crisis
How the West poisoned its money – Project Syndicate op-ed

English mέta - Centre for Postcapitalist Civilisation Political Politics and Economics Postcapitalism Talks Technofeudalism Video
Should we save capitalism? | Slavoj Žižek, Paul Krugman, Yanis Varoufakis, Shoshana Zuboff, and more – iai video

English mέta - Centre for Postcapitalist Civilisation Politics and Economics Postcapitalism Technofeudalism Video
Cloudalists: The New Ruling Class & how can we confront its technofeudal order – iai lecture, 10 APR 2022

ATHENS – To welcome the New Year with a cheeky take on the clash of economic ideologies, how might opposing camps’ representatives view Christmas presents? Levity aside, the answer reveals the pompousness and vacuity of each and every economic theory:
Neoclassicists: Given their view of individuals as utility-maximizing algorithms, and their obsession with a paradigm of purely utility-driven transactions, neoclassical economists can see no point in such a fundamentally inefficient form of exchange as Christmas gift-giving. When Jill receives a present from Jack that cost him $X, but which gives her less utility than she would gain from commodity Y, which retails for $Y (that is less than or equal to $X), Jill is forced either to accept this utility loss or to undertake the costly and usually imperfect business of exchanging Jack’s gift for Y. Either way, there is a deadweight loss involved.
To continue reading go to the Project Syndicate (free) site here…